#1Response to mutation on the forms
If you define the title meticulously relating to film, it’s basically stating morphing; changing into something else constantly which is what films all about. Its motion so there’s always going to be motion. I appreciate that there was a place created(no.w.here) for people to learn the culture of films and also a place that offered ways of making traditional non-digital films. I think accessibility is very needed, especially since money can add up when you need like 20 different things to produce the traditional film of your desire. I actually have never thought about films related to curators, I usually associate curators with paintings and things of that nature. I think it’s a really cool concept that allows people to see that film does have history and what worked and what did not work. Also, film as an art form because when I describe it as an art, people usually get confused thinking of it in only in mechanical ways. Technology makes it easier to make films but that doesn’t mean we can’t bring back the older methods—we all should use a veritable feast of ways. It would be amazing to keep those traditional methods alive so that, while we have a hugely free artistic atmosphere, we can explore that, through all methods, bringing our own unique individuality to the films. I think most of society will always be wrapped up in the next hottest thing or the best technology but there is a smaller percentage out there which is trying to love and appreciate film in all its avenues. I myself use a ton of juxtaposition to get people to really question what it is they just saw (the author has a statement about this) – usually something about human rights. I start with society’s view and the last scene is what’s actually real so as to bring attention to the unseen.
The concept of looking at the whole space is definitely lost in Hollywood films but is kept alive in various experimental films. The author mentions creating this immersive black and white on film experience which goes against the mainstream newness/spreading information through all outlets. This interested me a lot because I hate the news, social media and all things that encourage being not real it’s like a giant game of telephone where image is shared person to person and whatever the last person ends up saying is completely different from the original thought. I think it’s wonderful to present a new and real idea which is not an accumulation of millions if people. We need authenticity more than ever in this digital age.
If you define the title meticulously relating to film, it’s basically stating morphing; changing into something else constantly which is what films all about. Its motion so there’s always going to be motion. I appreciate that there was a place created(no.w.here) for people to learn the culture of films and also a place that offered ways of making traditional non-digital films. I think accessibility is very needed, especially since money can add up when you need like 20 different things to produce the traditional film of your desire. I actually have never thought about films related to curators, I usually associate curators with paintings and things of that nature. I think it’s a really cool concept that allows people to see that film does have history and what worked and what did not work. Also, film as an art form because when I describe it as an art, people usually get confused thinking of it in only in mechanical ways. Technology makes it easier to make films but that doesn’t mean we can’t bring back the older methods—we all should use a veritable feast of ways. It would be amazing to keep those traditional methods alive so that, while we have a hugely free artistic atmosphere, we can explore that, through all methods, bringing our own unique individuality to the films. I think most of society will always be wrapped up in the next hottest thing or the best technology but there is a smaller percentage out there which is trying to love and appreciate film in all its avenues. I myself use a ton of juxtaposition to get people to really question what it is they just saw (the author has a statement about this) – usually something about human rights. I start with society’s view and the last scene is what’s actually real so as to bring attention to the unseen.
The concept of looking at the whole space is definitely lost in Hollywood films but is kept alive in various experimental films. The author mentions creating this immersive black and white on film experience which goes against the mainstream newness/spreading information through all outlets. This interested me a lot because I hate the news, social media and all things that encourage being not real it’s like a giant game of telephone where image is shared person to person and whatever the last person ends up saying is completely different from the original thought. I think it’s wonderful to present a new and real idea which is not an accumulation of millions if people. We need authenticity more than ever in this digital age.
Comments
Post a Comment